Development and testing of power operated Interculture implements for poor and small farmers of Pakistan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2019
Views (754)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development and testing of power operated Interculture implements for poor and small farmers of Pakistan

Muhammad Kazim Nawaz, Zia-Ul-Haq, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam, Talha Mehmood, Abdul Qadeer
Int. J. Biosci. 15(2), 586-594, August 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In Pakistan Cotton (Gossypium) is planted during “summer” season from April to June, mainly in two provinces with Punjab 75% and Sindh 25% of the total area. It is an essential oil seed and fabric cash crop, lifeline for textile and palm-oil industry of the country. However, Grapevine (Vitis) is a major fruit and in Pakistan its 70% cultivated area is in Baluchistan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Pothwar region of North Punjab. Heavy weed infestation is the major cause of low productivity in cotton and grapevine. To improve yield effective weed control is vital, as weeds are the most efficient users of space, sunlight, water and nutrients due to their fast growth habits. Excessive use of pre and post emergence herbicides degrading air, water, soil environment and quality of produce. To protect environment power operated intercultural-implements with different shape of blade were developed at Malik Engineering Workshop Dhudial-Chakwal with collaboration with Faculty of Agricultural Engineering & Technology, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi during 2018-19. Machine performance was tested under local condition of Punjab at two sites. For grapevine at Site-A: University Research Farm Koont-Chakwal PMAS-AAUR and for cotton at Site-B: Maher-Rab-Nawaz-Sial Agriculture Farm, Mukhiana tehsil and district Jhang. The intercultural machine was tested for weeding efficiency, plant damage, speed, depth, theoretical field capacity, effective field capacity, field efficiency, fuel consumption and operational cost. Performance of the indigenously fabricated machine blades were compared with the available rotary weeder. The data collected to experimentation was statistically analyzed at 5% level of Probability.

Aristilde L, Reed ML, Wilkes RA, Youngster T, Kukurugya MA, Katz V, Sasaki CR. 2017. Glyphosate-induced specific and widespread perturbations in the metabolome of soil Pseudomonas species. Frontiers in Environmental Science 5, 34.

Bean C. 2019. Pakistan Cotton and Products Annual Cotton and Products Annual USDA Foreign Agriculture Service. Globle Agriculture information network.

Chavan M, Sachin C, Ashutosh R, Piyush S, Digvijay M. 2015. Design and development of weed removal implement. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology 3(5), 526-532.

Dhruwe NK. 2018. Development of self propelled rotary tiller cum inters row weeder. Trends in Biosciences 11(5), 694-697.

Goel AK, Behera D, Behera BK, Mohanty SK, Nanda SK. 2008. Development and ergonomic evaluation of manually operated weeder for dry land crops. Agricultural Engineering International: CIGR Journal.

Hegazy RA, Abdelmotaleb IA, Imara ZM, Okasha MH. 2014. Development and evaluation of small–scale power weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 31(3), 703-728.

Hunt SD, Morgan RM. 1995. The comparative advantage theory of competition. Journal of marketing 59(2), 1-15.

Hussain S, Shah M, Abbas M, Waqar Ullah, Imtiaz M, Ali M, Islam B, Said F, Jalal F. 2019. Pheno-Physiological Assessment of Grapes (Vitis vinifera) Germplasm Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University, Mardan, KPK, Pakistan.

Islam AS, Islam MT, Islam MS, Rahman AL, Rahman MA. 2017. Performance Evaluation of BRRI Power Weeder for Low Land Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Cultivation. The Agriculturists 15(1), 40-48.

Jeevarathinam A, Velmurugan C. 2014. Design Modification and Analysis of Rotavator Blade, Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering pp. 43-50.

Karnkal US. 2013. Design and development of self-propelled weeder for field crops. International Journal of Agricultural Engineering 6, 304-310.

Kepner RA, Bainer R, Barger EI. 2005. Principal of Farm Machinery. Pub. John Wiley and Sons, N.Y, U.S.A. pp.32-38.

Kishore Kumar G, Raj Kiran B, Ch Murali Krishna. 2018. Performance and Evaluation of Power Weeder, Wheel Hoe, Star Weeder under Dryland Conditions.

Mandal SK, Bhattachary B. 2013. Proceedings of the 1st International and 16th National Conference on Implements and Mechanisms, IIT Roorkee, India  (5), 595-607.

Manjunatha K, Anantachar M, Prakash KV, Desai BK, Vijayakumar P. 2016. Development and evaluation of tractor operated rotary weeder. Environment and Ecology 34(4), 1643-1648.

Mukhtar H, Ndiaye M, Philippe C, Ahmad N. 2011. The grape antioxidant resveratrol for skin disorders: promise, prospects, and challenges. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 508(2), 164-170.

Patange GS, Thokale PJ, Deshmukh VD. 2015. Performance evaluation of self-propelled rotary weeder. International journal of Agricultural Engineering 8(1), 70-74.

Rajashekar M, Heblikar VK, Mohan Kumar S. 2014. Simulation and analyze low cost weeder. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology 3(3), 543-549.

Rana SS, Rana MC. 2016. Principles and Practices of Weed Management. Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, 138, row weeder. International Journal on Emerging Technologies 6(1), 125-129.

Remesan R, Roopesh MS, Remya N, Preman PS. 2007. Wet land paddy weeding-A comprehensive comparative study from south India.

Sial KB, Kalhoro AD, Ahsan MZ, Mojidano MS, Soomro AW, Hashmi RQ, Keerio A. 2014. Performance of Different Upland Cotton Varieties under the Climatic Condition of Central Zone of Sindh. American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci 14, 1447-1449.

Tewari VK, Chandel NS, Vidhu KP, Tripathi H. 2014. Performance Evaluation and Scope of Adoption of Rotary Power Weeder in Vegetable Crops. Agricultural Engineering Today 38(3), 10-14.

Thorat Deepak S, Shoo PK, Dipankar De, Mir Asif Iquebal. 2014. Design and Development of Ridge Profile Power Weeder. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 51(4).

Related Articles

Protein profiling and antioxidant enzymatic activity of the ethanol extract of Cocculus hirsutus (L.) W. Theob. efficacy against Rhynchophorus ferrugineus

Marimuthu Malarvizhi, Jothi Dheivasikamani Abidharini, Arthi Boro, Murugesan Loganathan, Krishnaswamy Sujatha*, ArumugamVijaya Anand, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 222-241, February 2026.

Impact of organic and mineral fertilizers on the growth and biomass production of amaranth (Amaranthus cruentus L.) in Burkina Faso

Sidnoma Marie Emeline Vanessa Sompougdou*, Hugues Roméo Bazié, Philippe Bayen, Caroline Bassono, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 210-221, February 2026.

Antimicrobial resistance profiling and molecular characterization of a multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium from poultry environments in Bangladesh

Rashna Islam, Rubaya, Jahangir Alam, Anjuman Ara Bhuyan, Md. Abdul Alim, M. M. Kamal Hossain, Mir Rowshan Akter, Md. Sagir Ahmed, Shohel Mahmud*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 201-209, February 2026.

Lived experiences, psychosocial challenges and quality of life of drug surrenders

Van Ryan I. Alipoyo*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 184-200, February 2026.

Evaluation of the sensorial quality of peppermint (Mentha piperita) ice cream

Iriz Klir Austria, Michael Sta. Ana, Marigen E. Toraja*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 177-183, February 2026.

Epidemiology of polycystic ovary syndrome among young adult women: A cross sectional analysis

Ch. B. Praveena Devi*, S. Priya, P. Tanvi, S. Swathika, G. Bhavitha Sri, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 170-176, February 2026.

Comparative assessment of mixed and intercropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Md. Shamim Ahmed*, Mohammad Tojammel Haq, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 151-158, February 2026.