Effectiveness of practiced management options to control sheath blight disease of rice
Paper Details
Effectiveness of practiced management options to control sheath blight disease of rice
Abstract
Severity of the infection of sheath blight disease can be very devastating problem to the farmer for rice cultivation. Some of these consequences are major yield losses. The objective to identify sustainable management options for sheath blight disease. Field experiments were conducted with cultivated variety Swarna during three consecutive kharif seasons belong to the area of Rajshahi zone at three locations (Paba, Baraigram, Patnitala). Two management systems viz. Floating debris with Folicur and Folicur with ½ MOP were used in three locations to compare their effectiveness against rice sheath blight disease. The highest fertile tiller hill-1 was recorded at Paba location using Floating debris with Folicur. Maximum disease incidence was recorded at Patnitala location and minimum disease incidence was found at Baraigram. Between two management Floating debris with Folicur was better than Folicur with ½ MOP to reduces the disease incidence at all locations. The highest yield was found at Paba location using Floating debris with Folicur. Between two management systems, Floating debris with Folicur was better than Folicur with ½ MOP (Muriate of potash) to increase yield. Considering the efficiency and eco-friendly it would be considered that Floating debris with Folicur was effective management for sheath blight disease of rice.
Cubeta MA, Vilgalys R. 2011. Population Biology of the Rhizoctonia Solani Complex. Population Genetics of Soilborne Fungal Plant Pathogens 87, 480-84.
Farmando PC. 2006. Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety. Environmental Science and Policy 9, 685-692.
Gnanamanickam SS, Candole BL, Mew TW. 1992. Influence of soil factors and cultural practice on biological control of sheath blight of rice with antagonistic bacteria. Plant and Soil 144, 67-75.
Lee EN, Rush MC. 1983. Rice sheath blight: A major rice disease. Plant Disease 67, 829-832.
Marchetti MA, Bollich CN. 1991. Quantification of the relationship between sheath blight severity and yield loss in rice. Plant Disease 75, 773-775.
Mew TW, Rosales AM. 1986. Bacterization of rice plants for control of sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani. Phytopathology 76, 1260-1264.
Pareja L, Fernandz AR, Cesio V, Heinzen H. 2011. Analytical methods for pesticides residues in rice. TrAC trends in Analytical Chemistry 30, 270-291.
Parmeter JR. 1970. Rhizoctonia Solani, Biology and Pathology. London, UK: University of California, 1970. Print., University of California Biology and Pathology.
Sparks A, Castilla NP, Vera Cruz CM. Sheath blight. Rice Knowledge Bank, IRRI.
Vasantha DTV, Malar Vizhi R, Sakthivel N, Gnanamanickam SS. 1989. Biological control of sheath-blight of rlce in India with antagonistic bacteria. Plant and Soil 119, 325-330.
Mst. Nasrin Khanam, Md. Giush Uddin Ahmed, Most. Surovi Sultana, Tamanna Yeasmin, Ferdous Akter, Md. Shahanur Rahman, S. M. Zillur Rahman, Mr. Sukleash George Costa, Mr. Augustin Baroi, Md. Taibur Rahman, Md. Abul Bashar Mollah, M. Ekramul Hoque (2017), Effectiveness of practiced management options to control sheath blight disease of rice; IJMM, V5, N1, January, P1-5
https://innspub.net/effectiveness-of-practiced-management-options-to-control-sheath-blight-disease-of-rice/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0