Effects of salinity on the DNA methylation pattern in barley shoots

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2017
Views (731)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of salinity on the DNA methylation pattern in barley shoots

Samira Hamian, Seyyed Abolghasem Mohammadi, Mohammad Moghaddam, Ali Bande Hagh
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 10(1), 60-68, January 2017.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2017; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Salinity is a crucial factor which inhibits crop production worldwide. Recent pieces of evidence reveal that epigenetic mechanisms modulate the gene expression in plants undergoing environmental stresses. Obviously, when the epigenetic regulation of plant growth and response to these stresses are truly understood, a novel heritable variation could be developed for crop improvement. The present study attempted to evaluate the DNA methylation alteration made by salt stress in two barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars differing in salt tolerance, namely salt-tolerant Sahara3771 and salt-sensitive Clipper. Coupled Restriction Enzyme Digestion-Random Amplification (CRED-RA) was used to detect changes in the methylation pattern of the sequence CCGG in the nuclear genome of the plants growing under salinity stress (100 mM NaCl) and normal conditions. Leaf samples for DNA extraction were harvested 24 hours, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks after salt treatment. The results revealed that the average number of sites showing an increase in the methylation level at the three growth stages with the salt-stress imposition was higher in Sahara3771 (26.21%) than in Clipper (16.32%). Moreover, the number of sites with an increase in methylation under salt stress in Sahara3771 and Clipper, 24 hours and 5 weeks after imposing stress, respectively, was higher than the number of sites at the other stages. These results indicated a significant alteration of DNA methylation in plants as a response to salt stress and the effect was dose-dependent. These changes could provide a mechanism for the adaptation of plants under salt stress.

Bednarek PT, Orlowska R, Koebne RM, Zimny J. 2007. Quantification of the tissue culture induced variation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). BMC Plant Biology 7, 10-19.

Demirkiran A, Marakli S, Temel A, Gozukirmizi N. 2013. Genetic and epigenetic effects of salinity on in vitro growth of barley. Genetics and Molecular Biology36, 566-570.

Erturk FA, Agar G, Nardemir G, Arslan E, Sigmaz B. 2013. Epigenetic effects of Boron (b) pollution on Zea mays Seedlings. Journal of Selcuk University Natural and Applied Science 2, 757-762.

FAO. 2014. FAO STAT. FAO, Rome. www.faostat.fao.org

Grativol C, Hemerly AS, Ferreira PCG. 2012. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of stress responses in natural plant populations. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Regulatory Mechanisms 1819, 176-185.

Habu Y, Kakutani T, Paszkowski J. 2001. Epigenetic developmental mechanisms in plants: Molecules and targets of plant epigenetic regulation. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development 11, 215-220.

Imlay JA. 2003. Pathways of oxidative damage. Annual Reviews in Microbiology 57, 395-418.

Karan R, DeLeon T, Biradar H, Subudhi PK. 2012. Salt stress induced variation in DNA methylation pattern and its influence on gene expression in contrasting rice genotypes. Plos One 7, 1-10.

Ladeiro B. 2012. Saline agriculture in the 21st century: using salt contaminated resources to cope food requirements. Journal of Botany 2012, 1-7.

Mahajan S, Tuteja N. 2005. Cold, salinity and drought stresses: An overview. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics 444, 139-158.

McClelland M, Nelson M, Raschke E. 1994. Effect of site-specific modification on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases. Nucleic Acids Research 22, 3640-3659.

Mirouze M, Paszkowski J. 2011. Epigenetic contribution to stress adaptation in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14, 267-274.

Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard RW. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer-length polymorphisms in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences81, 8014-8018.

Suzuki MM, Bird A. 2008. DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nature Reviews Genetics 9, 465-476.

Tsaftaris AS, Polidoros AN. 2000. DNA methylation and plant breeding. Plant Breeding Reviews 18, 87-176.

Wang WS, Pan YJ, Zhao XQ, Dwivedi D, Zhu LH, Ali J, Fu BY, Li ZK. 2011. Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 1951-1960.

Wang WX, Vinocur B, Altman A. 2003. A plant responses to drought, salinity and extreme temperatures: towards genetic engineering for stress tolerance. Planta 218, 1-14.

Weitzman SA, Turk PW, Milkowski DH, Kozlowski K. 1994. Free radical adducts induce alterations in DNA cytosine methylation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 91, 1261-1264.

Zemach A, McDaniel IE, Silva P, Zilberman D. 2010. Genome-wide evolutionary analysis of eukaryotic DNA methylation. Science 328, 916-919.

Zhang G, Li C. 2010. Genetics and improvement of barley malt quality. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Zhejiang University Press, Hangzhou, 14-20.

Zhong L, Xu YH, Wang JB. 2009. DNA-methylation changes induced by salt stress in wheat Triticum aestivum. African Journal of Biotechnology 8, 6201-6207.

Related Articles

An investigation of phytochemical constitutents and pharmacological activities of Strobilanthes andamanensis leaf extract

Deepika, V. Ambikapathy, S. Babu, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 86-94, October 2025.

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.