Environmental knowledge, behaviors and attitudes of University students in Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2018
Views (737)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Environmental knowledge, behaviors and attitudes of University students in Mymensingh, Bangladesh

Minhaz Uddin, Saiket Talukder, Md. Shahadat Hossen, Md. Azharul Islam
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 12(6), 256-262, June 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The present study was conducted among the students of Bangladesh Agricultural University to investigate the responses of university students related to environmental issues. There were 300 participants from different educational level and they were randomly selected. The data were collected through personal interview by using a pre-tested structured questionnaire during the period from July 15 to November 15 in 2017. The number of male and female participants was 200 (66.7%) and 100 (33.3%), respectively. Undergraduate, MS and PhD students were 180 (60%), 100 (33.3%) and 20 (6.7%), respectively. Majority (36.7%) of the participants family residence were town, most of the participants father’s and mother’s educational qualification were BA/Honours (46.4%) and below S.S.C was 36.7%, respectively. The study revealed that most (70%) of the participants had a reasonable amount of environmental knowledge and 85.3% of the participants had incorrect knowledge about the cause of global warming. Maximum (88.4%) participants said that primary sources of environmental information were television and radio, internet, magazines and newspaper. The result also revealed that most (96.3%) of the participants thought that global warming is the most serious environmental problem in the world and 79% thought that natural disaster is the most serious environmental problem in Bangladesh. Participants environmental awareness level was high and they are highly concerned about different environmental issues and problems.

Abbas MY. 2013. Modern System of Garbage Disposal in Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, International Journal for Innovative Research and Studies Vol. 3, Issue 4/6.

Anonymous. 1995. Agenda 21, UNESCO-UNEP 30 May 2000. Available at: www.unep.org.

Decamps H. 2000. Demanding more of Landscape Research (and researches) Landscape and Urban Planning vol. 47, p. 105-109.

Gambro JS, Switzky HN. 1999. Variables associated with American high school students knowledge of environmental issues related to energy and pollution. Journal of Environmental Education Vol. 2(30), p. 15-22.

Gulgun B, Onder S, Aktas E, Ankaya FU. 2008. Responses of University Students Related to Environmental Problems: A Case Study of Ege University (Izmir-Turkey), Journal of International Environmental Application & Science Vol. 3(4), p. 234-246.

Meinhold JL, Malkus AJ. 2005. Adoloscent environmental behavior. Can knowledge, attitude, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and behavior Vol. 37(4), p. 511-532.

O’Brien SRM. 2007. “Indications of environmental literacy: using a new survey instrument to measure awareness, knowledge, and attitudes of university-aged students”. Retrospective Theses and Dissertations 15055.

Orr DW. 1992. Education and the ecological design arts. Conservation Biology Vol. 6(2), p. 162–164.

Ramsey CE, Rickson RE. 1976. Environmental knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education Vol. 8(1), p. 10-18.

Strauss B. 1995. Education in the real world. Conservation Biology Vol. 9(6), p. 1346–1348.

Thapa B. 2001. Environmental Concern: a Comparative Analysis between Students in Recreation and Park Management and Other Departments, Environmental Education Research Vol. 7, p. 39-53.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.