Evaluation of groundwater modeling

Paper Details

Short Communications 01/12/2011
Views (691)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of groundwater modeling

Paul C Njoku, Okoroji L
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 1(6), 174-178, December 2011.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2011; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study deals with groundwater technique involving flow hydrodynamics and water quality mass transport. Modeling is a very wide term as used and applied in earth sciences, many studies have conceptual models, hydrogeological models, mathematical models, analytical models, numerical models, stochastic models and deterministic models. There are marked differences among these models but also many similarities depending on their use and dimensions of applications. The study treated flow-hydrodynamics and Water quality-mass transport. The study deals with an evaluation of a conceptual model in hydrology which is the pictorial representation of the groundwater flow explained in the form of a block diagram. The observations of the research implication have been that qualitative interpretation of data and information of a site are conceptualized.

Pricket F.A and Lunnquist C J 1971. Selected digital computer technique for groundwater Resource Evaluation Illinois State water survey Bullet 55 p.c.

Tres Cott. 1976. Fint difference models for Aquifer simulation in two Dimensions with result of numerical experiment USGS Technique of water resource Investigations Washington.

Donald M, Harhaugh. 1984 Modular three Dimension Finite Difference groundwater Flow model Virginia.

Wavy HF, Anderson. 1982. introduction to groundwater modeling finite difference and finite elements methods W.H. Free man company San Francisco to California.

Bedient PH, Hubert WC. 1988. Hydrology and flood plain Analysis Anderson – Westley Publishing, Reading, Massachutess.

Heinzer T, Williams D. 2005. Applied Research in Arc objects-based Hydrodynamics Analysis.

Therrien R, Miclaren RG, Sudicky EA, Panday SM. 2004. HydroGeoSphere: A Three-dimensional Numerical Models Describing Fully Integrated Subsurface and Surface flow and solute transport, Manual (Draft), Hydrogeologic Inc, Herndon, VA.

Related Articles

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.

Determinants of tree resource consumption around Mont Sangbé national park in western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Serge Cherry Piba, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Naomie Ouffoue, Alex Beda, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 71-81, July 2025.