Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub
Evaluation of Talisay (Terminalia catappa) nuts by-products
Research Paper |
June 10, 2022
VIEWS 369 | Download
128
Mauricio S. Adlaon, Alicia Z. Maghuyop
Key Words:
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.20( 6), 1-10, June 2022
Certification:
IJAAR 2022 [Generate Certificate]Abstract
Sensory evaluation or analysis is an invaluable tool in determining the consumers’ acceptability of a product developed and eventually its market success. This is a sequel test after the chemical analysis and microbiological procedures have been conducted. The study determined the level of acceptability of the by-product of Talisay (Terminalia catappa) nuts specifically; Talisay Nuts Polvoron, Glazed Talisay Nuts, and Sugar-coated Talisay Nuts using sensory evaluation as to appearance, taste, aroma, sweetness, and texture. The responses of the food inclined participants are described yielding from the Hedonic Tests conducted and statistically treated. Results concluded that the developed products are remarkably acceptable and marketable.
VIEWS 369
Mauricio S. Adlaon, Alicia Z. Maghuyop (2022), Evaluation of Talisay (Terminalia catappa) nuts by-products; IJAAR, V20, N6, June, P1-10
https://innspub.net/evaluation-of-talisay-terminalia-catappa-nuts-by-products/
https://innspub.net/evaluation-of-talisay-terminalia-catappa-nuts-by-products/
Copyright © 2022
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0
Evaluation of Talisay (Terminalia catappa) nuts by-products
Dikilitaş K, Griffiths C. 2017. Thinking About the Context: Setting (Where?) and Participants (Who?). In: Developing Language Teacher Autonomy through Action Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Lawless HT, Heymann H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food Principles and Practices. New York: Chapman & Hall.
Meiselman HL, Macfie HJH. 1996. Food Choice Acceptance and Consumption, Glasglow, United Kingdom, Backie Academic & Professional.
Schiano AN, Harwood WS, Drake MA. 2017. A 100-Year Review: Sensory analysis of milk. Journal of Dairy Science 100(12), 9966-9986. https://doi.org/ 10.3168/jds.2017-13031
Singh-Ackbarali D, Maharaj R. 2014. Sensory Evaluation as a Tool in Determining Acceptability of Innovative Products Developed by Undergraduate Students in Food Science and Technology at the University of Trinidad and Tobago, Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 3, 1. https://doi.org /10.5430/jct.v3n1p10
Stone H, Sidel J. 2004. Introduction To Sensory Evaluation. In: Food Science Technology, Sensory Evaluation Practices (2nd ed.). https://doi.org /10.1016 /B978-012672690-9/50005-6
Watts BM, Jeffery IE, Elias LG. 1989. Basic Sensory Methods for Food Evaluation.Ottawa, Ontario (Canada): International Development Research Centre.
Yang Z. 2015. Research on the Sensory Design and Evaluation System for Food Shape and Color. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 8(12), 901-904. DOI:10.19026/ajfst.8.2728
