home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Microbial profile and antibiogram of isolates from diabetic foot ulcer in Tertiary Health Care Hospital of Central India

Paper Details

Research Paper 27/07/2023
Views (187) Download (32)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Microbial profile and antibiogram of isolates from diabetic foot ulcer in Tertiary Health Care Hospital of Central India

Rupam Gahlot, Suchita Gaur, Chaitanya Nigam, Neha Singh
Int. J. Micro. Myco.23( 1), 14-20, July 2023.
Certificate: IJMM 2023 [Generate Certificate]
Key: AntibiogramDiabeticFoot ulcerMicrobial profile

Abstract

To estimate the microbial profile and antibiogram of isolates from diabetic foot ulcer in tertiary care hospital of central India. This is a cross-sectional observational study conducted in patients presenting with diabetic foot ulcer in OPDs and admitted in tertiary care hospital of Chhattisgarh. Foot ulcer grading was done using Wagner’s classification. Samples processing, isolation and identification of positive isolates was done using standard microbiological procedures. Antimicrobial susceptibility was evaluated using CLSI guidelines. Total 30 patients of diabetic foot ulcer were included. Most common age group affected was 31-60 years (66.7%) followed by 61-90 years (26.7%). Male to female ratio was 2:1. Mean duration of diabetes was 3.36 years with minimum duration 10 days and maximum duration 20 years in study patients. According to Wagner’s grading, most common grade of ulcer was grade 1 (33.3%) followed by grade 2 (30%) and 3(30%). Peripheral neuropathy was associated in all cases and 43.3% showed association with hypertension. Most common site of diabetic ulcer was right foot 21 (70%) and dorsum of foot 17 (56.7%). Most common organism isolate was Pseudomonas aeruginosa (30%), followed by E. coli (25%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (25%). Among Gram positive most common organism isolate was Staphylococcus aureus (15%). Imipenem and Meropenem were found to be effective drugs for Gram-negative organisms. For Gram-positive coverage Gentamycin and cephalosporins was found to be effective. Early diagnosis, prompt patient care and implementation of strict antimicrobial stewardship practices are crucial for treatment of diabetic foot ulcer.

VIEWS 40
Cover PDF

American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes. 2011. Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan 34 Suppl 1, S11-61.

Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. 2004. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care 27(5), 1047-53.

Hu FB. 2011. Globalization of diabetes: the role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care [Internet]. 2011 Jun [cited 2018 Oct 6]; 34(6), 1249–57. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm .nih.gov/pubmed/21617109

ICMR-INDIAB, 2017. Diabetes is more prevalent among the urban poor: A summary of the findings of the ICMR-INDIAB Study. Curr Med Issues [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Oct 6];15(3):243. Available from: http://www.cmijournal.org/text.asp?2017/15/3/

Pendsey S New Delhi, India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers. 2003. Diabetic Foot: A Clinical Atlas. [Google Scholar] [Ref list]Mariam TG, Alemayehu A, Tesfaye E, Mequannt W, Temesgen K, Yetwale F, et al. Prevalence of Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Associated Factors among Adult Diabetic Patients Who Attend the Diabetic Follow-Up Clinic at the University of Gondar Referral Hospital, North West Ethiopia, 2016: Institutional-Based Cross-Sectional Study. J Diabetes Res [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2018 Oct 6];2017:2879249. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub med 10

Sinharay K, Paul UK, Bhattacharyya AK, Pal SK. 2012. Prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers in newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus patients. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23741832/ J Indian Med Assoc. 110, 608-611. [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Ref list]WHO | Diabetes cases could double in developing countries in next 30 years. WHO [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Oct 6]; Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/

Tripathy JP, Thakur JS, Jeet G.  2017. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes in a large community-based study in North India: results from a STEPS survey in Punjab, India. Diabetol Metab Syndr 9, 8.

WHO. 2010. Diabetes cases could double in developing countries in next 30 years. WHO [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2018 Oct 6]; Available from: http://www.who.int /mediacentre/news

Ramani A, Ramani R, Shivananda PG, Kundaje GN. 1991. Bacteriology of diabetic foot ulcers. Indian J Pathol Microbiol [Internet]. Apr [cited 2018 Oct 6];34(2):81–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1752646

Viswanathan V. 2010. Epidemiology of Diabetic Foot and Management of Foot Problems in India. Int J Low Extrem Wounds [Internet]. Sep 12 [cited 2018 Oct 6]; 9(3), 122-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20705622

Paras M, Hameed EAB. 2020. The risk factors of developing diabetic foot ulcers incidence with diabetic patients in Mukalla/Yemen. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences (SJMS) 25,153–62.

Ravoori HB, Hyndavi C, Vunnam PK. 2023. A comparative study between Wagner’s classification and new wound based diabetic foot ulcer severity score. Int Surg J 10, 443-9.

Submit Manuscript