home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Protease activity in Labeo rohita fingerlings fed Lactobacillus acidophilus and Spirulina platensis

Paper Details

Research Paper 05/01/2024
Views (512) Download (55)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Protease activity in Labeo rohita fingerlings fed Lactobacillus acidophilus and Spirulina platensis

Anni Jain Askwith Mary, R. Azhagu Raj
J. Bio. Env. Sci.24( 1), 10-15, January 2024.
Certificate: JBES 2024 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Dietary supplementationIntestineLabeo rohitaLactobacillus acidophilusProtease activitySpirulina platensis

Abstract

In the present 75-day experiment, protease activity was studied in the intestinal tissue of fingerlings of the freshwater fish Labeo rohita. The fish were fed diets containing 2%, 4%, and 6% concentrations at the rate of 3% of their body weight at 15-day intervals. The 210 fingerlings were divided into 4 groups; Fish group T0 (control diet) were fed a diet containing feed ingredients without experimental additives. Fish groups T1L, T2L, and T3L (experimental diets) were fed diets containing 2%, 4%, and 6% Lactobacillus acidophilus tablet (SPORALAC-DS) powder, in that order. Fish groups T1S, T2S, and T3S were fed diets containing 2%, 4%, and 6% Spirulina platensis powder, respectively. After the 75-day period, total protease was measured in the intestine of the fingerlings. It was observed that intestinal enzyme activity increased over time in both the control and experimental groups. Protease activity was highest in the 6% diet concentration groups, with significant increases seen in the Spirulina platensis-fed fingerlings compared to the control group and other groups. The results indicate that protease activity was highest in the group fed 6% Spirulina platensis (T3S), followed by the group fed 6% Lactobacillus acidophilus (T3L). This suggests that a 6% dietary concentration of either Spirulina platensis or Lactobacillus acidophilus can help enhance protease activity and growth in L. rohita fingerlings, with S. platensis showing greater efficacy.

VIEWS 146
Cover PDF

Albrektsen S, Mundheim H, Aksnes A. 2006. Growth, feed efficiency, digestibility and nutrient distribution in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) fed two different fish meal qualities at three dietary levels of vegetable protein sources. Aquaculture 261(2), 626-640.

Castro C, Pérez-Jiménez A, Coutinho F, Pousão-Ferreira P, Brandão TM, Oliva-Teles A, Peres H. 2013. Digestive enzymes of meagre (Argyrosomus regius) and white seabream (Diplodus sargus). Effects of dietary brewer’s spent yeast supplementation. Aquaculture 416, 322-327.

De Medeiros VPB, Salgaço MK, Pimentel TC, da Silva TCR, Sartoratto A,  Lima MDS, Sassi CFDC, Mesa V, Magnani  M, Sivieri K. 2022. Spirulina platensis biomass enhances the proliferation rate of Lactobacillus acidophilus 5 (La-5) and combined with La-5 impact the gut microbiota of medium-age healthy individuals through an in vitro gut microbiome model. Food Research International 154, 110880.

Debnath S, Saikia SK. 2020. Characterization of amylase and protease activity in the digestive tract of two teleosts (Labeo rohita and Anabas testudineus) with different feeding habits. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 64(2), 173-179. DOI:10.14232/abs.2020.2.173-179173

FDA U. 1993. Enzyme preparations: recommendations for submission of chemical and technological data for food additive petitions and GRAS Notices.

Fuller R. 1989. A review: probiotics in man and animals. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 66(5), 365-378.

Hidalgo MC, Urea E, Sanz A. 1999. Comparative study of digestive enzymes in fish with different nutritional habits. Proteolytic and amylase activities. Aquaculture 170, 267-283.

Kumar S, Garcia-Carreño FL, Chakrabarti R, Toro AN, Córdova-Murueta JH. 2007. Digestive proteases of three carps Catla catla, Labeo rohita and Hypophthalmichthys molitrix: Partial characterization and protein hydrolysis efficiency. Aquaculture Nutrition 13(5), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00488.x

Madhav Bhilave. 2019. Protease activity profile in freshwater fish Labeo rohita fed on formulated fish feed. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews 6(2), 347-355.

Matthias BG, Ahrens RN, Allen MS, Tuten T, Siders ZA, Wilson KL. 2018. Understanding the effects of density and environmental variability on the process of fish growth. Fisheries Research 198, 209-219.

Mir JI, Sarkar UK, Gusain OP, Dwivedi AK, Joukrushna J. 2013. Age and growth in the indian major carp Labeo rohita (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from tropical rivers of Ganga basin, India. Rev Biol Trop 61(4), 1955-66.

Moraes G, de Almeida LC. 2020. Nutrition and functional aspects of digestion in fish. In Biology and physiology of freshwater neotropical fish (pp. 251-271) Academic Press.

Oliva‐Teles A. 2012. Nutrition and health of aquaculture fish. Journal of Fish Diseases 35(2), 83-108.

Portella MC, Dabrowski K. 2008. Diets, physiology, biochemistry and digestive tract development of freshwater fish larvae. Feeding and digestive functions of fishes. Enfield: Science Publishers, 227-279.

Rowland I, Gibson G, Heinken A, Scott K, Swann J, Thiele I, Tuohy K. 2018. Gut microbiota functions: metabolism of nutrients and other food components. European Journal of Nutrition 57, 1-24.

Saravanan K, Sivaramakrishnan T, Praveenraj J, Kiruba-Sankar R, Haridas H, Kumar S, Varghese B. 2021. Effects of single and multi-strain probiotics on the growth, hemato-immunological, enzymatic activity, gut morphology and disease resistance in Rohu, Labeo rohita. Aquaculture 540, 736749.

Sarder MRI, Yeasin M, Jewel MZH, Khan MMR, Simonsen V. 2011. Identification of Indian major carps (Catla catla, Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus cirrhosus) and their hybrids by phenotypic traits, allozymes and food habits. Asian Fisheries Science 24(1), 49-61.

Sreekanth GB, Mayekar TS, Kumar S, Rivonkar P, Varghese T, Kumar S, Chakurkar EB. 2021. Fresh Water Ornamental Fish Culture and Management (Scheduled Caste Sub Plan) Govt. of India. ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute, ICAR-Central Institute of Fisheries Education, Mumbai, Maharashtra. Technical Bulletin No. 69.

Walter HE. 1984. Proteinases: methods with hemoglobin, casein and azocoll as substrates. In: Bergmeyer, H.J. (Ed.), Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, Vol. V. Verlag Chemie, Weinham, 270-277 p.

Submit Manuscript