Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2019
Views (756)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Anwar Hussain, Afzaal Muhammad, Umer Hayat, Bashir Ahmad, Murtaza Ali, Kholod Khalid Mohammed Boathor, Saif Ullah
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 15(2), 88-94, August 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Rice is amongst the most vital food crops that provide an essential food for approximately half of the world’s population. Rice crops are disposed to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses contain insect pests, fungus and herbicide toxicity. This study was conducted at Agricultural Research Institute (North) Mingora Swat, Khyber Pakhtun Khwa (Pakistan) in 2014 to determine the toxicity of Karate (Lambda Cyhlothrin 2.5g/l), Lorsban (Chlorpyrifos 500g/l), Talstar (Bifentnthrin 100g/l), Lannate (Methomyl 225g/l). Curacron (Profenofos 500g/l) were applied to rice varieties (Oryza sativa), Basmati-385, JP-5, Fakhr-e-Malakand, Swat-1 and Dilrosh against rice stem borer, (Scirpophaga incertulas) and their effect on yield per hectare. In this study, the most resistant rice cultivar and effective insecticide against rice stem borer were investigated. Talstar Super resulted in to highest ranked in their efficacy against rice stem borer; as (3.7%) dead hearts while (7.5%) white hearts was recorded, which is significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control. Talstar with (52.71%) infestation was the most effective insecticide against rice stem borer followed by karate with (44.04%), Lorsbon (42.24%) and Lannate (41.70%). The lowest biological efficacy was recorded for Curacon (10.17%) significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the other tested varieties. The result also displayed the resistance of Swat-1, Basmiti-385 and Dilrosh to rice stem borer. This study made clear the Basmati-385 was the most susceptible variety against rice stem borer with lowest yield, JP-5 with (1688.3kg/ha) ranked first.

Ahmad N, Khan M, TofiquE M. 2011. Insect pests management of BT cotton through the manipulation of different eco-friendly techniques. Nucleus (Islamabad) 48, 249-254.

Bashir K, Husnain T, Fatima T, Latif Z, Mehdi SA, Riazuddin S. 2004. Field evaluation and risk assessment of transgenic indica basmati rice. Molecular Breeding 13, 301-312.

Bux M, Khan M, Ahmad N, Tofique M, Ismail M. 2013. Field comparison of different rice (Oryza sativa L) genotypes for their resistance against rice stem borers (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak. J. Agri 29, 137-145.

Inayatullah C, Rehman A, Ashraf M. 1986. Management of insect pests of paddy in Pakistan. Progressive Farming (Pakistan) 6, 54-62.

Iram S, Ahmad I, Ashraf M. 2003. A study on fungi and soil born diseases associated with rice-wheat cropping system of Punjab province of Pakistan. Pak J. Biol. Sci 6, 1-6.

Jahn GC, Almazan LP, Pacia JB. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Entomology 34, 938-943.

Jahn GC, Litsinger JA, Chen Y, Barrion AT. 2006. 15 Integrated Pest Management of Rice: Ecological Concepts.

Jiang Y, Duan H, LI J, Yuan L, Wang Z, Gong C, Pei Q. 2005. Current situation and control countermeasures of eventful rice diseases and pests in Shanghai suburbs. Shanghai Nongye Xuebao 21, 78-81.

Khan L, Khaliq A. 1989. Field evaluation of some granular insecticides for the control of rice stem borers [Scirpophaga incertulas, S. innotata, Chilo polychrysa and Sesamia inferens]. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (Pakistan).

Khan RA, Khan JA, Jamil F, Hamed M. 2005. Resistance of different basmati rice varieties to stem borers under different control tactics of IPM and evaluation of yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany 37, 319.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.