Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2019
Views (634)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Response of rice cultivars and insecticides against Rice stem borer (Scirpophaga incertulus) in Pakistan (Swat)

Anwar Hussain, Afzaal Muhammad, Umer Hayat, Bashir Ahmad, Murtaza Ali, Kholod Khalid Mohammed Boathor, Saif Ullah
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 15(2), 88-94, August 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Rice is amongst the most vital food crops that provide an essential food for approximately half of the world’s population. Rice crops are disposed to both biotic and abiotic stresses. Biotic stresses contain insect pests, fungus and herbicide toxicity. This study was conducted at Agricultural Research Institute (North) Mingora Swat, Khyber Pakhtun Khwa (Pakistan) in 2014 to determine the toxicity of Karate (Lambda Cyhlothrin 2.5g/l), Lorsban (Chlorpyrifos 500g/l), Talstar (Bifentnthrin 100g/l), Lannate (Methomyl 225g/l). Curacron (Profenofos 500g/l) were applied to rice varieties (Oryza sativa), Basmati-385, JP-5, Fakhr-e-Malakand, Swat-1 and Dilrosh against rice stem borer, (Scirpophaga incertulas) and their effect on yield per hectare. In this study, the most resistant rice cultivar and effective insecticide against rice stem borer were investigated. Talstar Super resulted in to highest ranked in their efficacy against rice stem borer; as (3.7%) dead hearts while (7.5%) white hearts was recorded, which is significantly (P < 0.05) lower than control. Talstar with (52.71%) infestation was the most effective insecticide against rice stem borer followed by karate with (44.04%), Lorsbon (42.24%) and Lannate (41.70%). The lowest biological efficacy was recorded for Curacon (10.17%) significantly lower (P < 0.05) than the other tested varieties. The result also displayed the resistance of Swat-1, Basmiti-385 and Dilrosh to rice stem borer. This study made clear the Basmati-385 was the most susceptible variety against rice stem borer with lowest yield, JP-5 with (1688.3kg/ha) ranked first.

Ahmad N, Khan M, TofiquE M. 2011. Insect pests management of BT cotton through the manipulation of different eco-friendly techniques. Nucleus (Islamabad) 48, 249-254.

Bashir K, Husnain T, Fatima T, Latif Z, Mehdi SA, Riazuddin S. 2004. Field evaluation and risk assessment of transgenic indica basmati rice. Molecular Breeding 13, 301-312.

Bux M, Khan M, Ahmad N, Tofique M, Ismail M. 2013. Field comparison of different rice (Oryza sativa L) genotypes for their resistance against rice stem borers (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak. J. Agri 29, 137-145.

Inayatullah C, Rehman A, Ashraf M. 1986. Management of insect pests of paddy in Pakistan. Progressive Farming (Pakistan) 6, 54-62.

Iram S, Ahmad I, Ashraf M. 2003. A study on fungi and soil born diseases associated with rice-wheat cropping system of Punjab province of Pakistan. Pak J. Biol. Sci 6, 1-6.

Jahn GC, Almazan LP, Pacia JB. 2005. Effect of nitrogen fertilizer on the intrinsic rate of increase of Hysteroneura setariae (Thomas) (Homoptera: Aphididae) on rice (Oryza sativa L.). Environmental Entomology 34, 938-943.

Jahn GC, Litsinger JA, Chen Y, Barrion AT. 2006. 15 Integrated Pest Management of Rice: Ecological Concepts.

Jiang Y, Duan H, LI J, Yuan L, Wang Z, Gong C, Pei Q. 2005. Current situation and control countermeasures of eventful rice diseases and pests in Shanghai suburbs. Shanghai Nongye Xuebao 21, 78-81.

Khan L, Khaliq A. 1989. Field evaluation of some granular insecticides for the control of rice stem borers [Scirpophaga incertulas, S. innotata, Chilo polychrysa and Sesamia inferens]. Pakistan Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research (Pakistan).

Khan RA, Khan JA, Jamil F, Hamed M. 2005. Resistance of different basmati rice varieties to stem borers under different control tactics of IPM and evaluation of yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany 37, 319.

Related Articles

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.

Determinants of tree resource consumption around Mont Sangbé national park in western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Serge Cherry Piba, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Naomie Ouffoue, Alex Beda, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 71-81, July 2025.