Growth response and changes of soil chemical properties with application of vermichar in bell pepper production

Paper Details

Research Paper 03/07/2024
Views (764)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Growth response and changes of soil chemical properties with application of vermichar in bell pepper production

Rex Topinio Mendoza, Artemio Martin Jr
Int. J. Biosci. 25(1), 50-61, July 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of vermichar as organic soil amendment on bell pepper and its effect on soil chemical properties. The study was laid out using the Randomized Complete Block (RCB) design to test the following treatments: T1-Control, T2-90-60-30 kg NPK, T3-90-60-30 kg NPK plus 5 bags vermichar, T4-90-60-30 kg NPK plus 10 bags vermichar, T5-90-60-30 NPK plus 15 bags vermichar and T6-10 bags vermichar. The experiment was established at the College of Agriculture, Isabela State University, Echague, Isabela from November 2023 to March 2024. Result of the study shows that the application of vermichar improves soil pH, soil nitrogen (0.01-0.22%), soil P (160.14-519.24 ppm), K (214-310ppm), Co (2.71-6.40ppm), Zn (2.89-18.93ppm). In addition, no significant effect was also observed in terms of iron and manganese when soil was applied with 5 10 15 bags of vermichar. Growth of bell pepper was also affected by the increased rate of vermichar application due to the inherent nutrient present in the material. In terms of crop productivity, bell pepper applied with 10 to 15 bags plus the addition of recommended amount of NPK recorded the highest number of fruit and yield resulting also to have the highest return of investment compared to control plants.

Alan W. 1993. Soil and environment. Cambridge Low price edition. Cambridge University Press, p.  144.

Chan KY, Zwieten LV, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. 2007. Agronomic Values of Green Waste Biochar as a Soil Amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 629–634.

Chong RS. 2005. Using organic fertilizers. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center.

Edwars A. 1998. Characterization of Biochars to Evaluate Recalcitrance and Agronomic Performance. Bioresour Technol 114, 644–653.

Kalantari S, Hatami S, Ardalan MM, Alikhani HA, Shorafa S. 2010. The effect of compost and vermicompost of yard leaf manure on growth of corn. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(11), p 1317-1323.

Kale RD, Bano K. 1986. Field Trials with Vermicompost: An Organic Fertilizer. Proceedings of National Seminar on Organic Wate Utilization by Vermicomposting, GKVK Agricultural University, Bangalore.

Kale VA. 2008. Utilization of various combinations of soybean and jowar straw based complete feed in Osmanabadi kids. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences 3(2), 196-197.

Kimetu J, Lehmann S. 2010. Stability and stabilization of biochar and green manure in soil with different organic carbon contents. Australian Journal of Soil Research 48, 577-585 p.

Onofeghara FA. 1981. The effects of growth substances on the flowering and fruiting of Lycopersicon esculentus and Vigna unguiculata. Phyton 40(1), 107-116.

Orozco PG, Abiodun BJ, Ajayi AE, de Giesen NV. 2016. Effects of charcoal production on soil physical properties in Ghana. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science 171(4), 591-596.

Raghothama KG. 1999. Phosphate acquisition. Ann. Rev. Plant Physical. Plant Mol. Bio. 50, 665-693.

Shinde R, Shani DK, Mahapatra P, Singh CS, Naik SK, Thombare N, Singh AK. 2022. Management of crop residues with special reference to the on-farm utilization methods: a Review. Industrial Crops and Products 181, 114772.

Related Articles

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.