In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Paper Details

Research Paper 15/06/2026
Views (2)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.
Keywords: Bambara groundnut
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Bambara groundnut is one of the food legumes with significant nutritional potential. However, this crop is susceptible to numerous fungal diseases, particularly seedling blight caused by Macrophomina phaseolina. The objective of this study was to identify resistant genotypes to M. phaseolina. Thus, nineteen Bambara groundnut genotypes, including fifteen M3 mutants, were evaluated in vitro for their resistance to IS-246, an isolate of M. phaseolina that proved virulent in pathogenicity tests. Each genotype was sown into 10 glass dishes (500 mL) containing PDA culture medium, of which five dishes were inoculated with M. phaseolina, and five were left uninoculated as controls. The results showed that the germination rate ranged from 0% to 80%, with an average of 23.5% among the inoculated genotypes. In contrast, the germination rate of uninoculated genotypes ranged from 50% to 100%, with an average of 73.5%.  The severity index ranged from 1.33 to 5 based on a scale of 0 to 5. The means separation test classified the genotypes into three groups: moderately resistant genotypes with severity indices between 1 and 2, the susceptible genotypes with severity scores between 3 and 4, and the highly susceptible genotypes with severity indices between 4 and 5. The genotypes KVS115_M3S12, KVS115_M3S6, KVS115_M3S5, and KVS259_M3S8, which showed moderate resistance, constitute a potential source of improvement for a Bambara groundnut breeding program in Burkina Faso.

Abawi GS, Pastor-Corrales MA. 1990. Root Rots of Beans in Latin America and Africa: Diagnosis, Research Methodologies, and Management Strategies. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. pp. 1–114. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/54258

Atiq M, Asad S, Rafique M, Khan NA, Rehman A, Younis M. 2014. Identification of source of resistance in mung bean germplasm against charcoal rot disease. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology 26, 133–136.

Baikoro MD, Zida PE, Koala M, Soalla WR, Neya BJ, Guissou ML. 2023. Importance et distribution de Macrophomina phaseolina associé aux semences de niébé au Burkina Faso: Caractérisation préliminaire des isolats du champignon. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 17, 1456–1471. https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v17i4.14

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2020. Manuel d’amélioration des plantes par mutation. 3rd ed. Sous la supervision de M. M. Spencer-Lopes, B. P. Forster et L. Jankuloski. Vienna: FAO/IAEA. pp. 1–210. https://doi.org/10.4060/i9285fr

Iqbal U, Mukhtar T, Muhammad S, Ul-Haque I, Malik SR. 2010. Host plant resistance in blackgram against charcoal rot (Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid.). Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology 22, 126–129.

Langarica HR, Maldonado-Moreno N, Pecina-Quintero V, Mayek-Pérez N. 2008. Reacción de germoplasma mejorado de soya [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] a Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goidanich y déficit hídrico. Revista Mexicana de Fitopatología 26, 105–113.

Lebeda A, Svabova L. 2010. In Vitro Screening Methods for Assessing Plant Disease Resistance. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

Manici LM, Cerato C, Caputo F. 1992. Pathogenic and biological variability of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. isolates in different areas of sunflower cultivation in Italy. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Sunflower Conference 1, 779–784.

Marquez N, Giachero ML, Declerck S, Ducasse DA. 2021. Macrophomina phaseolina: General characteristics of pathogenicity and methods of control. Frontiers in Plant Science 12, 634397.

Mathur SB, Kongsdal O. 2003. Common Laboratory Seed Health Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi. International Seed Health Testing Association. pp. 89–96.

Mubaiwa J, Fogliano V, Chidewe C, Linnemann AR. 2017. Hard-to-cook phenomenon in Bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.) processing: Options to improve its role in providing food security. Food Reviews International 33(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2016.1149864

Oladimeji A, Balogun OS, Busayo TS. 2012. Screening of cowpea genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina infection using two methods of inoculation. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology 6, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajppaj.2012.13.18

Ouoba A, Ouédraogo M, Sawadogo M, Nadembega S. 2016. Aperçu de la culture du voandzou [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] au Burkina Faso: Enjeux et perspectives d’amélioration de sa productivité. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 10, 652–665.

Ouoba A, Sawadogo N, Ouédraogo HM, Nandkangré H, Konaté MN, Zida EP, Soalla RW, Ouédraogo M, Sawadogo M. 2019. Phenotyping Bambara groundnut landraces for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goidnich. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 21, 547–552. https://doi.org/10.17957/IJAB/15.0927

Ouoba A. 2017. Caractérisation génétique et identification de morphotypes de Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc. cultivés au Burkina Faso et résistants aux principaux champignons responsables des maladies foliaires. PhD Thesis, Université Joseph KI-ZERBO, Burkina Faso. pp. 95–102.

Ramos AM, Gally M, Szapiro G, Itzcovich T, Carabajal M, Levin L. 2016. In vitro growth and cell wall-degrading enzyme production by Argentinean isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina, the causative agent of charcoal rot in corn. Revista Argentina de Microbiología 48, 267–273.

Rayatpanah S, Dalili SA. 2012. Diversity of Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. based on chlorate phenotypes and pathogenicity. International Journal of Biology 4, 54–63.

Rayatpanah S, Nanagulyan SG, Alav SV, Razavi M, Ghanbari-Malidarreh A. 2012. Pathogenic and genetic diversity among Iranian isolates of Macrophomina phaseolina. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 72, 40–44.

Saima S, Wu G. 2019. Effect of Macrophomina phaseolina on growth and expression of defense-related genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of the National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka 47, 1–13.

Sarr MP, Ndiaye M, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW. 2014. Genetic diversity in Macrophomina phaseolina, the causal agent of charcoal rot. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 53, 250–268.

Sharma I, Kumari N, Sharma V. 2014. Defense gene expression in Sorghum bicolor against Macrophomina phaseolina in leaves and roots of susceptible and resistant cultivars. Journal of Plant Interactions 9, 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2013.832425

Tingueri B, Ouedraogo MH, Tondé WH, Bonkoungou TO, Thiombiano C, Ouoba A, Ouedraogo D, Sawadogo M. 2024. Genetic variability induced by gamma radiation on second generation (M₂) mutants of Bambara groundnut [Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc.] in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biosciences 25, 83–96. https://doi.org/10.12692/ijb/25.2.83-96

Williams RJ, Singh SD. 1981. Control of pearl millet downy mildew by seed treatment with metalaxyl. Annals of Applied Biology 99, 263–268.

Related Articles

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.