home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Study on genetic variation of 14 soybean cultivars using cluster and factor analysis under water stress and non-stress conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2015
Views (321) Download (16)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Study on genetic variation of 14 soybean cultivars using cluster and factor analysis under water stress and non-stress conditions

Seyyed Mohammad Ali Kargar, Ali Mostafaie, Eslam Majidi Hervan, Seyyed Said Pourdad
J. Bio. Env. Sci.6( 3), 100-112, March 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Cluster analysisFactor analysisSoybeanWater stress

Abstract

This experiment was conducted in Mahidasht Agricultural Research Station in the west part of Iran in RCBD with three replications under normal and drought stress conditions. The cluster analysis based on ward method showed the cultivars were grouped by four clusters under non-stress condition. The cultivars of clusters were including; (I: Baj-maj); (II: M9, Hy-1 and LD9); (III: The fertile cultivars as L17, Union, Bonus, Williams, Steel, Elgine, Clark) and (IV: The infertile cultivars as Hack, Flanklin and Halcor) respectively; While they were grouped by three clusters under stress condition. These cultivars of clusters were including (I: The infertile cultivars as Baj-maj, Steel, Williams, Bonus, Hack, Halcor and Flanklin); (II: The cultivars as Hy-1, Elgine and M9); (III: The fertile cultivars as Clark, LD9, L17, Clark and Union); respectively. The evaluation of discriminate function on 14 soybean cultivars under non-stress condition showed 3 functions with eigenvalues more than 1 explained totally 100% of cultivar variations. The evaluation of discriminate function on 14 soybean cultivars under stress condition showed 2 functions with eigenvalues more than 1 explained totally 100% of cultivar variations. In factor analysis on 9 traits under non-stress condition, there were three components with 73.86% of traits variation with varimax rotation method. The contribution of first, second and third components were 38.08%, 20.56% and 15.21%, respectively. On the other hand three components explained 74.79% of traits variation with varimax rotation method under stress condition. The contribution of first, second and third components were 32.57%, 27.20 and 15.02 respectively. The cluster analysis based on wards method showed four clusters of traits in both stress and non-stress conditions.

VIEWS 12
Cover PDF

Brown-Guedira GL, Thompson JA, Nelson RL, Warburton ML. 2000. Evaluation of genetic diversity of soybean introductions and north American ancestors using RAPD and SSR markers. Crop Science 40, 815-823.

Dong YS, Zhao LM, Liu B, Wang ZW, Jin ZQ, Sun H. 2004. The genetic diversity of cultivated soybean grown in China. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 108, 931-936.

Ghafoor A, Sharif A, Ahmad Z, Zahid MA, Rabbani MA. 2001. Genetic diversity in black gram (Vigna mungo L. Hepper). Field Crops Research., 69:183-190

Guan R, Chang R, Li Y, Wang L, Liu Z, Qiu L. 2010. Genetic diversity comparison between Chinese and Japanese soybeans (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) Revealed by nuclear SSRs. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 57, 229-242.

Liu M, Zhang M, Jiang W, Sun G, Zhao H, Hu S. 2011.Genetic diversity of Shaanxi soybean landraces based on agronomic traits and SSR markers. African Journal of Biotechnology. 10 (24), 4823-4837.

Mannan MA, Karim MA, Khaliq QA, Haque MM, Mian MAK, Ahmed JU. 2010. Assessment of Genetic Divergence in Salt Tolerance of Soybean (Glycine max L.) Genotypes. Journal of Crop Science of Biotechnology. 13 (1), 33- 38.

Masoudi B, Bihamta MR, Babaei HR, Peyghambari SA. 2008. Evaluation of genetic diversity for agronomic, morphological and phonological traits in soybean. Seed and plant. 24(3), 413-427.

Narjesi V, Khaneghah HZ. Zali EE. 2007. Assessment of genetic relationship in few important agronomic characters with grain yield in soybean by multivariate statistical analysis. Agriculture and Natural Research Science. 41(11), 227-234.

Panndy RK. 1987. A farmer on growing soybean on Richland. International rice research institute. IRRI.216 pages.

Rabbani MA, Iwabuchi A, Murakami Y, Suzuki T, Takayanagi K. 1998. Phenotypic variation and the relationship among mustard (Brassica juncea L.) germplasm from Pakistan. Euphytica, 101, 357-366.

Salimi S, Samiezade H, Lahiji G, Abadi M, Salimi S, Moradi S. 2012. Genetic Diversity in soybean genotypes under drought stress condition using factor analysis and cluster analysis. World Applied Science Journal. 16 (4), 474-478.

Smartt, J. 1990. Evolution of genetic resources. In: Grain legumes, (Ed.): J. Smartt. pp. 140-175.Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Smith JSC, Smith OS. 1989. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: The utility of morphological, biochemical and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34, 151-161.

Upadhyaya HD, Ortiz R, Bramel PJ, Singh S. 2002. Phenotypic diversity for morphological and agronomic characteristics in chickpea core collection. Euphytica 123(3), 333-342.

Upadhyaya HD. 2003. Phenotypic diversity in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) core collection assessed by morphological and agronomical evaluations. Genetic Research Crop Evolution 50, 539-550.

Wang KJ, Li XH, Li FS. 2008. Phenotypic Diversity of the Big Seed Type Sub collection of wild soybean (Glycine soja Sieb.et Zucc.) in China,” Genetic. Resources and Crop Evolution, 55(8), 1335-1346. doi:10.1007/s10722-008-9332-z

Wang M, Li RZ, Yang WM, Du WJ. 2010. Assessing the genetic diversity of cultivars and wild soybeans using SSR markers. African Journal of Biotechnology 9, 4857-4866.

Zhao YY, Geng ZD, Bao LP, Wang TJ. 2007. Principal component analysis and cluster analysis of local soybean varieties of Yunnan. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University (Natural Sciences).

Submit Manuscript