Statistical control of the suitability of milk obtained from different season for cheese yield and human consumption

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/08/2018
Views (644)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Statistical control of the suitability of milk obtained from different season for cheese yield and human consumption

Özlem Ertekin, Murat Çimen, Yeliz Yilmaz
Int. J. Biosci. 13(2), 187-192, August 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In this study, statistical control on somatic cell counts of milk obtained from the seasons performed for determination of suitability to cheese yield and human consumption standards. In the study, 30 Holstein cows were used as animal material. The Milk SCC was compared with the announced standards for cheese yield and maximum consumption level for human using one-sample t test. Milk SCC rates for all seasons (125,530, 125,000, 134,666, 137,660 cells/ml for autumn, winter, spring and summer, respectively) were lower than reference limit value of cheese yield (max. 500,000 cells/ml). Observed SCC levels for each season were lower than announced limits for human consumption (max. 400,000 cells/ml). Found SCC rates in the study were so suitable for both standards. Increased values in SCC for spring and summer season could be an undesirable level for extremely sensitive consumers although it is suitable for human consumption. Milk containing low SCC in autumn and winter season is more favorable in terms of flavor of milk and economic gain of producers.

Anonymous. 1996. IDF Standard 122 C. Milk and milk products preparation of samples and dilutions for microbiological examination. Brussels. International Dairy Federation.

Bansal BK, Hamann J, Lind O, Singh ST, Dhaliwal PS. 2007. Somatic cell count and biochemical components of milk related to udder health in buffaloes. Italian Journal of Animal Science 6(2), 1035-1038.

Cimen M. 2015. Fen ve Sağlık Bilimleri Alanlarında Spss uygulamalı Veri Analizi. Palme Press, Paper No: 905, ISBN: 978-605-355-366-3. Sıhhıye, Ankara. (In Turkish).

Harmon RJ. 1994. Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2103-2112.

Klein AE, Menrad K, Heider D. 2016. Determinants of Consumers’ Willingness-to-pay for Fairly-produced, Locally Grown Dairy Products. German Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65(2), 94-111.

Koç A. 2008. A Study of Somatic Cell Counts in the Milk of Holstein-Friesian Cows Managed in Mediterranean Climatic Conditions. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science. 32(1), 13-18.

Li N, Richoux R, Boutinaud M, Martin P, Gagnaire V. 2014. Role of somatic cells on dairy processes and products: a review. Dairy Science and Technology 94(6), 517- 538.

Mikulec DP, Petrovic MP, Raycheva E. 2012. Effect of variations in somatic cell count on cheese yield on the Stara Planina in Serbia. International Journal of Recent Research Applied Studies 12(1), 57-60.

Mistry VV, Kosikowski FV. 1988. Yield and quality of Cheddar cheese from high SCC milk supplemented with retentive to varying concentrations or directly ultrafiltered. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 2333-2341.

More SJ. 2009. Global trends in milk quality: implications for the Irish dairy industry. Iran Veterinary Journal 62(4), 5-14.

Norusis MJ. 1993. SPSS for Windows: Base System User’s Guide, SPSS, Chicago.

Rupp R, Boichard D, Bertrand C, Bazin S. 2000. Overview of milk somatic cell counts in the French dairy cattle breeds. Production Animal 13, 257-267.

Sharma N, Singh NK, Bhadwall MS. 2011. Relationship of somatic cell count and mastitis: an overview. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science 24(3), 429-438.

Related Articles

Sensory evaluation of horn snail (Telescopium telescopium) patty

Ma. Isabel P. Lanzaderas, Gilbert P. Panimdim, Proceso C. Valleser Jr.*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 7-16, February 2026.

Two years evolution of deltamethrin, malathion and pirimiphos-methyl resistance in Aedes aegypti from urban in peri urban sites of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Hyacinthe K. Toe*, Moussa W. Guelbeogo, Soumananaba Zongo, Aboubacar Sombie, Athanase Badolo, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 1-6, February 2026.

Physicochemical characterization of annatto seeds (Bixa orellana) sold in Ouagadougou and their oils extracted using chemical processes

Mah Alima Esther Traoré*, Adama Lodoun, Pingdwindé Marie Judith Samadoulougou-Kafando, Nestor Beker Dembélé, Kiswendsida Sandrine Léticia Dayamba, Charles Parkouda, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 169-178, January 2026.

Inventory of african yam bean (Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Harms) diversity in some Yoruba areas of Benin

Orobiyi Azize*, Faton Manhognon Oscar Euloge, Zongo Élisabeth Aboubié, Sossou Kpèdé Nicodème, Houngbo Marcel, Dossou Pierre Fourier, Ogoudjobi Ladékpo Sylvain, Balogoun Ibouraïman, Dansi Alexandre, Lokoyêyinou Laura Estelle, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 161-168, January 2026.

A severe case of human hepatic fascioliasis mimicking an oncological disease in Azerbaijan

Aygun A. Azizova*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 155-160, January 2026.

Combined effect of irrigation frequency and leaf harvesting intensity on soil water content and productivity of baobab (Adansonia digitata) seedlings in vegetable production

Sissou Zakari, Imorou F. Ouorou Barrè, Mouiz W. I. A. Yessoufou*, Colombe E. A. E. Elegbe, Amamath S. Boukari, P. B. Irénikatché Akponikpè, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 143-154, January 2026.

Develop sustainable coffee-based farming model using cash crops production

Maribel L. Fernandez, Roje Marie C. Rosqueta*, Diosa G. Alasaas, Boyet C. Pattung, Jaylord Dalapo, Janette Empleo, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 134-142, January 2026.

Animal anthrax in northern Tanzania (2015-2025): Epidemiological trends and frontline response capacity

Yohana Michael Kiwone*, Beatus Lyimo, Rowenya Mushi, Joram Buza, Int. J. Biosci. 28(1), 123-133, January 2026.