Evaluation of salt stress effect in 50 genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) using different parameters
Paper Details
Evaluation of salt stress effect in 50 genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) using different parameters
Abstract
The identification of traits of tolerance to salinity may contribute to the selection of genotypes that can enhance the saline environments. In this experiment 50 genotypes of durum wheat consisting of 4 Australian lineages, 6 Tunisian cultivars and 40 lines of the ICARDA were evaluated in saline (150 Mm) and normal condition (tap water). Different agronomic traits, including the total number of tillers per plant, number of tillers per ear, the dry weight (g), the number of spikelets per spike, the average weight of ears, number of seeds per ear, kernel weight (g) and yield (g) were measured to distinguish salt tolerance between genotypes. Salt tolerance indexes (STI) was evaluated. A variable response to salt stress was observed. The air dry matter, the number of tillers per ear, tillering capacity and the kernel weight were the most informative and useful traits for screening for salt tolerance in durum wheat. This analysis allowed us to distinguish 4 lines from ICARDA and 2 Tunisian varieties as the most tolerant to saline stress among all the genotypes analyzed
Ahmad MB, Niazi H, Zaman B, Athar M. 2005. Varietals differences in agronomic performance of six wheat varieties grown under saline field environment. International. Journal Environment Science 2, 49–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03325857
Allah CR. 1991. Grown tomato under saline conditions. In: Allah CR, ed. Plant Salinity. Research New Chellenges 201-12.
Allakhverdiev SI, Sakamoto A, Nishiyama Y, Inaba M, Murata N. 2000. Ionic and osmotic effects of NaCl-induced in activation of photo systems I and II in Synechococcus sp. Plant Physiology 123, 1047-56.
Alam MZ, Haider SA, Paul NK. 2007. Yield and Yield Components of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars in Relation to Nitrogen Fertilizer. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 3(10), 1022-1026.
Alem C, Labhilili M, Brahimi K, Jlibene M, Nasrallah N, Filali MA. 2002. Adaptations hydrique et photosynthétique du blé dur et du blé tendre au stress salin. Comptes Rendus Biologies 325, 1097-1109.
Anderson MN, Heidmann T, Plauborg F. 1996. The effect of drought and nitrogen on light interception, growth and yield of winter oilseed rape. Soil Plant Science 6(1), 55- 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/090647.
Baena-González E, Sheen J. 2008. Convergent energy and stress signaling. PubMed Commons 13(9), 474-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.006.
Bchini H, Ben Naceur M, Sayar R, Sakouhi. 2009. Agronomic parameters contributing to the salt stress tolerance in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Annual INRAT 82.
Benamar B, Daguin Kaid-Harche M. 2009. Effect of salt stress on germination and growth in vitro of pistachio (Pistacia vera L.). Comptes Rendus Biologies 332, 752-758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2009.03.008
Bhatti MA, Ali Z, Bakhsh A, Razaq Jamali AR. 2004. Screening of Wheat lines for Salinity Tolerance. International Journal for Agriculture and Biology 6, 627-628.
Botia P, Carvagal M, Cerda A, Martinez V. 1998. Response of eight Cucumis melo cultivars to salinity during germination and early vegetative growth. Agronomie 18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/agro:19980801
El-Hendawy SE, Ruan Y, Hu Y, Schmidhalter U. 2009. A comparison of screening criteria for salt tolerance in wheat under field and controlled environmental conditions. Journal Agronomy Crop Science 195, 356-367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00372.x
El-Hendawy SA, Yuncai H, Gamal MY, Ahmed MA, Salah EH, Urs S. 2005. Evaluating salt tolerance of wheat genotypes using multiple parameters. European journal of agronomy 22, 243-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.03.002
Garcia-Legaz MF, Ortiz JM, Garcia-Lidon A, Cerda A. 1993. Effect of salinity on growth, ion content and CO2 assimilation rate in lemon varieties on different rootstocks. Physiologia Plantarum 89, 427-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13993054.1993.tb05194.x
Gouny P, Cornillon P. 1973. La salinité, aspects théoriques, modes de contrôle. PHM Revue Horticole 142, 3-7.
Hachicha M, Job JO, Mtimet A. 1994. Les sols salés et la salinisation des sols en Tunisie. Sols de Tunisie. Bulletin de la Direction des Sols 15, 270-341.
Handy S, Cao X, Buehler TJ, Mokhtarian P. 2005. The Link between the Built Environment and Travel Behavior, Correlation or Causality Presented. Transportation Research Board Meeting. On TRB CD-ROM.
Jafari-Shabestari J, Corke H,. Qualset CO. 1995. Field evaluation of tolerance to salinity stress in Iranian hexaploid wheat landrace accessions. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 42, 147-156. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02539518
Kingsbury RW, Epstein E. 1984. Selection for salt resistant spring wheat. Crop Science 24, 310-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1984.0011183X002400020024x
Munns R. 2002. Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant Cell and Environment 25, 239-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.00168025.2001.00808.x
Mallek-Maalej E, Boulasnem F, Ben Salem M. 1998. Effet de la salinité sur la germination de graines de céréales cultivées en Tunisie. Cahiers Agricultures 2,153-6.
Mans R, Rawson HM. 2004. Effect of salinity on salt accumulation and reproductive development in the apical meristem of wheat and barley. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 26(5), 459-464.
Mass EV, Grieve CM. 1994. Tiller development in salt-stressed wheat. Crop Science 34, 1594–1603.
Mass EV, Poss JA. 1989. Salt sensitivity salinity on whcat at various growth stages. Irrigation Sciences 10, 29-40.
Munns R, Richard AJ, Lauchli A. 2006. Approaches to increasing the salt tolerance of wheat and other cereals. Journal of Experimental Botany 57 (5), 1025-1043. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erj100
Pervaiz Z, Afzal M, Sun XI, Xiaoe Y, Ancheng L. 2002. Mechanisms of Salt Tolerance in Selected Wheat Cultivars. International Journal of Agriculture Biology 22, 141–144.
Pervaiz Z, Afzal M, Xiaoe Y, Ancheng L. 2002. Selection criteria for salt tolerance in wheat cultivars at seedling stage. Asian Journal Plant Science 1, 85–8.
Ponnamieruma PN. 1984. Role of cultivars tolerance in increasing rice production on saline land. In RC. Staples GH. Toenniessen (Eds.), Salinity tolerance in plants strategies for crop improvement, 255-71.
Richards RA, Dennett CW, Qualset CO, Epstein E, Norlyn JD, Winslow MD. 1987. Variation in yield of grain and biomass in wheat, barley, and triticale in a salt-affected field. Field Crops Research 15, 277- 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4290(87)90017-7
Sadiq MS, Siddiqui KA, Arain CR, Azmi AR. 1994. Wheat breeding in water stress environment. I. Delineation of drought tolerance and susceptibility. Plant Breeding 113, 36-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0523.1994.tb00699.x
Slavich PG, Read BJ, Cullis BR. 1990. Yield response of barley germplasm to field variation in salinity quantified using the Em-38. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 30, 551-556.
Ueda A, Kanechi M, Uno Y, Inagaki N. 2003. Photosynthetic limitations of a halophyte sea aster (Aster tripolium L.) under water stress and NaCl stress. Journal of Plant Research 116, 65-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-002-0070-6
Wyn Jones RG, Gorham T. 1993. Salt tolerance. In: Johnson, C.B. (Ed.) Physiological Processes. Limiting Plant Productivity Butterworths, 271–292.
Zeng L, Shannon MC, Grieve CM. 2002. Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic parameters. Euphytica 127, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020262932277
Zeng L, Shannon MC. 2000. Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice. Crop Science 40, 996–1003.
S. Abdelkader, CH. Ramzi, R. Mustapha, B. Houcine, B. N. M'barek, M. N. Inagaki, B. Abdallah (2017), Evaluation of salt stress effect in 50 genotypes of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) using different parameters; IJB, V11, N2, August, P11-24
https://innspub.net/evaluation-of-salt-stress-effect-in-50-genotypes-of-durum-wheat-triticum-durum-desf-using-different-parameters/
Copyright © 2017
By Authors and International
Network for Natural Sciences
(INNSPUB) https://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0