Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Paper Details

Research Paper 17/04/2026
Views (509)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*
Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2026; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The present study focused on the extraction, purification, and characterization of proteins from seeds of Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica, along with evaluation of their anti-proliferative potential. Protein estimation using the Lowry method revealed higher protein content in grape seed extract (4.98 ± 0.14 mg/mL) compared to mango seed extract (4.20 ± 0.12 mg/mL). Spectrophotometric analysis at 280 nm showed higher absorbance for grape seed protein (1.32 ± 0.05) than mango seed protein (1.08 ± 0.04), confirming greater protein abundance. SDS-PAGE profiling indicated multiple protein bands in the range of 30–97 kDa for grape seeds and 35–80 kDa for mango seeds, with grape seed proteins exhibiting greater molecular diversity. The anti-proliferative activity of the purified proteins was assessed using the MTT assay against HeLa and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. A dose-dependent decrease in cell viability was observed, with HeLa cells showing higher sensitivity (IC₅₀ ≈ 120 µg/mL) compared to MCF-7 cells (IC₅₀ ≈ 135 µg/mL). At 200 µg/mL, cell viability decreased to 29.5% in HeLa and 35.0% in MCF-7 cells. Morphological assessment uses light microscopy and acridine orange/ethidium bromide staining revealed characteristic apoptotic features, including cell shrinkage, membrane blebbing, chromatin condensation, and nuclear fragmentation, confirming apoptosis as the primary mechanism of cell death. Overall, the results indicate that grape seed proteins possess higher protein content, greater structural complexity, and stronger anti-proliferative activity compared to mango seed proteins. These findings highlight the potential of seed-derived proteins as promising natural candidates for anticancer applications and support further investigation into their molecular mechanisms.

Andrews P. 1964. Estimation of molecular weights of proteins by gel filtration. Biochemical Journal 91, 222–233.

Burgess RR. 2009. Protein precipitation techniques. Methods in Enzymology 463, 331–342.

Dixon M, Webb EC. 1979. Enzymes (3rd ed.). Academic Press.

Harborne JB. 1998. Phytochemical methods: a guide to modern techniques of plant analysis (3rd ed.). Springer.

Hughes WL. 1935. A method for protein fractionation by salt precipitation. Journal of Biological Chemistry 111, 207–216.

Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680–685.

Lam SK, Ng TB. 2011. Lectins: production and practical applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 89(1), 45–55.

Layne E. 1957. Spectrophotometric and turbidimetric methods for measuring proteins. Methods in Enzymology 3, 447–454.

Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry 193, 265–275.

Mosmann T. 1983. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival. Journal of Immnological Methods 65(1–2), 55–63.

Peterson EA, Sober HA. 1956. Chromatography of proteins. Journal of the American Chemical Society 78, 751–755.

Queiroz JA, Tomaz CT, Cabral JMS. 2001. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins. Journal of Biotechnology 87(2), 143–159.

Ribble D, Goldstein NB, Norris DA, Shellman YG. 2005. A simple technique for quantifying apoptosis. BMC Biotechnology 5, 12.

Scopes RK. 1994. Protein purification: principles and practice (3rd ed.). Springer.

Shewry PR, Napier JA, Tatham AS. 1995. Seed storage proteins: structures and biosynthesis. The Plant Cell 7(7), 945–956.

Shi J, Yu J, Pohorly JE, Kakuda Y. 2003. Polyphenolics in grape seeds: biochemistry and functionality. Journal of Medicinal Food 6(4), 291–299.

Soong YY, Barlow PJ. 2004. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of selected fruit seeds. Food Chemistry 88(3), 411–417.

Zar JH. 2010. Biostatistical analysis (5th ed.). Pearson Education.

Related Articles

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.

Solvents’ influence on polyphenolic compound extractions from Lippia multiflora leaves (Mold, 1949), and their antioxidant activity

Kelemin Awa Koné*, Tagouèlbè Tiho, Mariam Sanogo, Casimir Kekou, Kouassi Hervé Tani, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 109-116, May 2026.

Economics of selected cropping system practices in the province of La Union, Philippines

Jennifer A. Cabading, V. Sagun Analyn, Angelina T. Gonzales*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 97-108, May 2026.

The hidden burden: A review of toxicity from femoral orthopedic implants

Haroon Habib Beigh*, Nabeel Khan, Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Int. J. Biosci. 28(5), 84-96, May 2026.