Investigation of relationship between yield and yield components of wheat under drought stress using multivariate analysis

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2013
Views (788)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Investigation of relationship between yield and yield components of wheat under drought stress using multivariate analysis

Seied Mehdi Mirtaheri, Farzad Paknejad, Marieh Behdad, Mohammad Reza Tookalo
Int. J. Biosci. 3(6), 8-14, June 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In order to evaluate effects of drought stress on yield and some relevant traits of bread wheat cultivars, current study was carried out in the research field of Islamic Azad University of Karaj during 2006-2007. The irrigation schemes scheduled as main plots included the following: (T1) 40% moisture depletion throughout the growing season (control); (T2) 60% moisture depletion throughout the growing season; (T3) 80% moisture depletion throughout the growing season; (T4) no irrigation at stem elongation and continuing with adequate irrigation to the end; (T5) no irrigation from stem elongation to the end of the growing season; (T6) no irrigation at flowering and continuing with adequate irrigation to the end; (T7) no irrigation from flowering to the end of the growing season; and (T8) no irrigation from milk stage to the end; and 2 wheat cultivars [Marvdasht (V1), Chamran (V2)] as sub-plots. The simple correlation results showed that seed yield has a positive, significant correlation with the biomass, Harvest index, Plant height, 1000 grain weight and Spike numbers per square meter. According to results of principal component analysis an increase in the number of components was associated with a decrease in eigenvalues and its maximum at three factors which all together accounted for 70.87% of the total variation of grain yield.

Asseng S, Turnera NC, Rayb JD, Keatingc BA. 2002. A simulation analysis that predicts the influence of physiological traits on the potential yield of wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 17, 123–141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00149-6

Baloch MJ, Dunwell J, Dennet M, Ul-hassan Z, Rajpar I, Jatoi WA, Veesar NF. 2012. Evaluating spring wheat cultivars for drought tolerance through yield  and  physiological  parameters at booting and anthesis. African Journal of Biotechnology 11, 11559-11565. http://dx.doi.org/10.5897//AJB12.17001

Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218, 443–448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.218.4571.443

Cattivelli L, Rizza F, Badeck FW, Mazzucotelli E,  Mastrangelo  AM,  Francia  E, Marè  C, Tondelli A, Stanca AM. 2008. Drought tolerance improvement in crop plants: An integrated view from breeding to genomics. Field Crops Research 105, 1-14.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.004

Everit BS, Dunn G. 1992. Applied multivariate data analysis. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

Larcher W. 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology. 3th Edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

Leilah AA, Al-Khateeb SA. 2005. Statistical analysis  of  wheat  yield  under  drought  conditions. Journal of Arid Environments 61, 483–496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2004.10.011

Lev-Yadun S, Gopher A, Abbo S. 2000. The cradle of agriculture. Science 288, 1602–1603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5471.1602

Shahryari R, Gurbanov E, Gadimov A, Hassanpanah  D.  2008.  Tolerance  of  42  Bread wheat Genotypes to Drought stress after Anthesis. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 10, 1330-1335. http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2008.1330.1335

Singh BN, Vishwakarma S R, Singh VK. 2010. Character association and path analysis in elite lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Archives 10, 845-847.

Tester M, Langridge P. 2010. Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327, 818–822. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1183700

Wong JH, Marx DB, Wilson JD, Buchanan BB, Lemaux PG, Pedersen JF. 2010. Principal component analysis and biochemical characterization of protein and starch reveal primary targets for improving sorghum grain. Plant Science 179, 598-611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.08.020

Related Articles

African swine fever outbreak in Camiguin Island, Philippines: An analysis of biosecurity and control strategies

Nena V. Siaboc*, Libby Jay Roasol Cascon, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 199-208, April 2026.

Phytochemical profiling, quantitative estimation, bioactivity studies and GC-MS analysis of fruit methanolic extract of Kamettia caryophyllata (Roxb.) Nicolson & Suresh

P. G. Jiji*, E. A. Mariya, Prasobh K. Mohan, K. Aswathy Surendran, E. P. M. Sruthy, Kavya K. Sasikumar, Anas Bin Firoz, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 187-198, April 2026.

Frequency of occurrence of pathogens of diseases observed in cucumber (Cucumis sativa L.) plants

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, A. G. Eyvazov, E. I. Allahverdiyev, S. F. Azadaliyeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 181-186, April 2026.

Apparent digestibility of nutrients in diets based on dried Okara (Solid residue from soy milk and cheese production) in growing rabbits in Benin

Atchadé Ghislaine Sègbédji Théodora*, Edénakpo Kocou Aimé, Yètomè Amour, Bonou Gbodja Gilbert, Houndonougbo Mankpondji Frédéric, Mensah Guy Apollinaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 155-163, April 2026.

Philippines dipterocarp research (2000-2025): Trends, gaps and future priorities

Jay Mark G. Cortado, Angelo L. Lozano*, Reymark P. Rivera, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 138-154, April 2026.

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.