Effect of planting pattern and plant density on some quantitative traits spotted bean cos16 line

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2013
Views (696)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effect of planting pattern and plant density on some quantitative traits spotted bean cos16 line

Mohammad Dashti Marvili,Mojtaba Jafarzadeh Kenarsari, Mohammad Hassan Kooshki
Int. J. Biosci. 3(6), 212-219, June 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of planting density on some quantitative traits bean cos 16 line. The experiment was carried out split plot base on randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Station Borujerd in crop year 2009-2010. In this study the main plots was row spacing including 25, 50 and 75 cm with signs of A1, A2 and A3 and subplots included three densities of 30, 40 and 50 plants per square meter marks B1, B2 and B3. Each plot consisted of 7 lines with length 6 m. and between each two plot one line was considered as the no planting line. After soil testing, land plowed and on the tenth of May, disk operations and ground leveling, planting was performed. The fertilizer was applied based on soil test. In addition to weed control herbicide Terflan (2 liters per hectare) was used. During the growth period combat pests was done. At harvesting time, number of branches, pod length, number of seeds per pod, seed weight, biological yield and grain yield were measured. Experimental results showed that the grain yield per hectare at spacing between rows, and different densities were significant at the 5% level. Maximum production per unit area was obtained in the maximum distance between the rows and the highest density.

Bagheri A, Mahmoudi A, Dynqzly F. 2001. Beans Research for Crop Improvement. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. First Edition. P. 556.

Torabi Jafroudi A, Hasanzade A, Fayaz Moghaddam A. 2007. Effects of plant population on some of morph physiological characteristics of two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars. Pajouhsh & Sazandegi 74, 63-71

Khajehpour M R. 2000. Principles of Agriculture. Press Center of Agricultural Jihad Isfahan Industrial. 386 p.

Shahsavari Khajehpour MR, Rezaei AR. 1994. Yield components of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 1, 53-61.

Abdi A. 2009. Effect of plant density on grain yield and its components in bean area Borujerd.

Fallah S. 2007. Study of growth, yield and yield components of three cultivars of Chickpea in different densities and under two moisture levels in Khorramabad. Master’s thesis, Department of Agriculture, Isfahan University of Technology.

Ghanbari A, Taheri Mazandarani M. 2004. Effects Of Sowing Date And Plant Density On Yield Of Spotted Bean. Seed and plant improvement journal 19, 483-496

Kahrarian B. 2002. Effect of row spacing and plant spacing on yield and yield components of white beans. Master’s thesis, University of Zabol, Iran.

Majnoon Hosseini N.1993.Legumes in Iran. Jihad Publications of Tehran University, Tehran, Iran.

Mousavi S M, Fathi GH, Dadgar M. 2005. Effect of planting date and plant density on growth, yield and yield components of red bean. Articles First National Conference on legumes, Institute for Plant Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

Hashemi Jazy SM, Danesh A. 2003. Effect of row spacing and plant distances in row on grain yield and yield components in chiti bean cv. Talash. Journal of Crop Sciences 5, 155-163.

Buttery BR. 1996. Effects of plant population and fertilizer on the growth and yield of soybean. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 49, 659- 673.

Dhanjal R, Prakash OM,   Ahlawat IPS. 2001, Response of French bean (phaseoluse vulgaris L.) varieties to  plant density,  International Journal  of plant physiology 46, 277 – 281.

Herbert  SG,  Baggerman  FD.  1983.  Cowper responscto rew width, density, and irrigation. JournalAgron 75, 982-989.

Xu C, Pierre FJ. 1998. Dry bean and soil response to tillage and row spacing. Agron Journal 90, 393-399.

Related Articles

Frequency of occurrence of pathogens of diseases observed in cucumber (Cucumis sativa L.) plants

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, A. G. Eyvazov, E. I. Allahverdiyev, S. F. Azadaliyeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 181-186, April 2026.

Apparent digestibility of nutrients in diets based on dried Okara (Solid residue from soy milk and cheese production) in growing rabbits in Benin

Atchadé Ghislaine Sègbédji Théodora*, Edénakpo Kocou Aimé, Yètomè Amour, Bonou Gbodja Gilbert, Houndonougbo Mankpondji Frédéric, Mensah Guy Apollinaire, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 155-163, April 2026.

Philippines dipterocarp research (2000-2025): Trends, gaps and future priorities

Jay Mark G. Cortado, Angelo L. Lozano*, Reymark P. Rivera, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 138-154, April 2026.

Anti-proliferative potential of seed derived proteins from Vitis vinifera and Mangifera indica

Hareeshthulasi, V. Vinotha, R. Rajakumar*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 129-137, April 2026.

Valorisation of table waste and fruit waste by black soldiers (Ullicens hermetica)

Ayaba Adéline Hounnou, Vanessa Chabi, Jomini Marc Sène Alitonou, Franck Sokenou, Mickael Vitus Martin Kpessou Saïzonou, Fidèle Paul Tchobo, Guy Alain Alitonou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 123-128, April 2026.

Murraya koenigii (Linn.) Spreng.: An opulent source of fatty acid

Shahin Aziz*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 116-122, April 2026.

Design and architecture of an IoT-enabled bamboo resource management system: Data-driven approach for sustainable agriculture

Charlot L. Maramag*, Dorothy M. Ayuyang, Richard R. Ayuyang, Int. J. Biosci. 28(4), 107-115, April 2026.