Genetic Association and path coefficient analysis among yield and yield related traits in Tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MILL.)
Asati BS, Rai N, Singh AK. 2008. Genetic parameters study for yield and quality traits in tomato. The Asian J. of Hort, 3, 222-225.
Chattopadhyay A, Paul A. 2012. Studies on heterosis for different fruit quality parameters in tomato. Int. J. of Agri.Env.and Biotech, 4, 405-409.
Dewey DR, Lu KH. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis of components of crested wheatgrass seed production. Int. J. of Agro 51, 515-518.
FAOSTAT. 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAOSTAT Database. (Last accessed on 10 October 2016).
Gogogi D, Ghotum. 2003. Correlation and path analysis in tomato (SolanumlycopersiconMILL). Agri. Sci. Digest, 23, 162-166.
Gul R, Rahman H, Tahir M, Naeem M, Ghafoor A. 2013. Estimates of heterosis for morphological and flavor attributes in tomato. Int. J. of Veg. Sci, 19, 256-262.
Islam BMR, Ivy NA, Rasul MG, Zakaria M. 2010. Character association and path analysis of exotic tomato (SolanumLycopersicon MILL.) Genotypes. Bang. J. of Plant Breed. and Genet, 23, 22-229.
Johnson HW, Robinson HF, Comstock RE. 1955. Estimation of genetic and environmental variability in soybean. Agro.J. 47, 314-31.
Meena, Bahadur. 2015. Study of path analysis in tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.). Europ. J. of Agri. Sci, 7, 231-241.
MFAL. 2015. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Islamabad, Last accessed on 20 September 2016. (Last accessed on 25 August 2016). www.paktive.com/mfal.265EB23.
MNFSR. 2015. Ministry of National Food Security and Research, Islamabad, http//mnfsr.gov.pk/gop/index.Php.
Mohanty BK. 2002. Variability, heritability, correlation and path coefficient studies in tomato. Haryana J. of Hort. Sci, 31, 230-233.
Mohanty BK. 2003. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient studies in tomato. Ind. J. Agri. Research, 37, 68-71.
Monamodi EL, Lungu DM, Fite GL. 2013. Analysis of fruit yield and its components in determinate tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL) using correlation and path coefficient. Bot. J. of Agri. and App. Sci, 9, 29-40.
Moya C, Alvarez M, Varela M, Mesa ME. 1996. Estimates of genetic-statistical parameters in three different groups of tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.) J. of Pl. Sci, 17, 67-71.
Prasad VSRK, Rai M. 1999.Genetic variation, component association and direct and indirect selections in some exotic tomato germplasm. Ind. J. of Hort, 56, 262-266.
Prashanth S, Jiprakashnarayan JRP, Mulge Y, Ravindra H, Madalageri C. 2008. Correlation and path analysis in tomato (SolanumLycopersicon MILL.). Asian. J. of Hort, 3, 403-408.
Ramzan A, Khan TN, Nawab N, Hina A, Noor T, Jillani G. 2014. Estimation of genetic components in f1 hybrids and their parents in determinate tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.). Pak. J. of Agri. Res, 521, 65-75.
Rani CI, Veeraragavathatham D. 2008. Studies on heterosis in root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) resistant hybrids in tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.). The Asian. J. of Hort. 3, 40-44.
Rani I, Veeraragavathatham D, Sanjutha D. 2008. Studies on correlation and path coefficient analysis on yield attributes in root knot nematodes resistant F1 hybrids of tomato. J. of App. Sci. Res, 4, 287-295.
Rashidi M, Gholami M, Khabbaz BG. 2009. Response of yield and yield components of tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.) to different tillage methods. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 11, 626-630.
Rashidi M, Gholami M, Khabbaz BG. 2009. Response of yield and yield components of tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.) to different tillage methods. Int. J. of Agri. and Bio, 11, 626-630.
Singh PK, Singh RK, Saha BC. 1989. Correlation and path analysis in tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.). Annals of Agri. Res, 10, 120-124.
Sivaprasad K. 2008. Genetic variability and correlation studies in biparental mating populations of tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.).J. of Agri. Sci. Dha. Ind, 4, 58-65.
Tiwari JK, Upadhyay D. 2011. Correlation and path-coefficient studies in tomato (Solanumlycopersicon MILL.). Res. J. of Agri. Sci, 2, 63-68.